VOL. 25, ISSUE 6 Thursday, May 8, 2008 SINCE 1973

Prof. Diane

Huling-Reed
Granted Tenure After All


By Jessie Forand, Brittany Rhoads, and Nathan Burgess

In a reversal of an earlier decision, JSC President Barbara Murphy has granted tenure to a popular professor in the Fine and Performing Arts Department.

“I’m very happy to have been awarded tenure. After being denied last year, and then being given a second chance, I am particularly delighted,” said Assistant Professor of Performing Arts Diane Huling-Reed after being informed recently that the president had reconsidered a spring 2007 decision in which she endorsed the Promotion Tenure and Review (PRT) committee’s recommendation to the administration not to grant her tenure.

“What is encouraging is to see that the process itself, while strenuous and stress-inducing, worked,” Huling said. “Without the support and encouragement of the president, though, I would not have had this opportunity. I look forward to continuing my work with the students here.”

A number of music majors were shocked by the announcement of that initial denial last fall, some of them conveying their dismay and disappointment to the president in personal letters.

When asked for comment on this latest development, PRT Chair Jim Black, Academic Dean Daniel Regan and President Murphy noted longstanding policies that prohibit specific comment on personnel matters, but one thing is clear: Murphy ultimately reconsidered her initial acceptance of the PRT Committee’s recommendation based on a variety of factors and circumstances.

Dean of Academic Affairs Dan Regan explained that while the PRT committee and academic dean may make recommendations about whether or not to grant tenure, the college president has the final say. Regan added, however, that the academic dean’s recommendation usually corresponds with that of the PRT Committee, and in turn, the president’s ultimate decision is usually in agreement with the recommendations she receives.

This is not a universal truth, though, according to Regan: “Generally the recommendations are in line with each other’s recommendations, but not always.”

In addition, Regan said that a decision reversal such as this is not common, but is also not unheard of.

Regan explained that a full-time professor is reviewed for tenure after working at the institution for six years unless that faculty member announces his or her resignation. The term tenure means permanency, Regan said, adding that it is the most important decision a college can make. For the recommendation process, Regan explained that PRT recommendations go first to him, and then his go to President Murphy; both of these must be in written form.

While Regan declined to comment on his personal recommendation for Huling-Reed because it was a personnel matter, he did say, “For years I have been clear about how effective a teacher Diane Huling Reed is, and so I am delighted, actually, that her proven teaching prowess is going to continue to be available to JSC students. She really is a very good teacher.”

As for the role students play in potential institutional decisions, Regan said, “I think that at every stage of the process, everyone who recommends or decides is taking into account a number of different considerations – what’s good and important for students, what’s fair to the faculty member involved, and also the integrity of the tenure review process.”

The dean stressed that Huling-Reed’s teaching competence has not been an issue: “I have gone on the record for several years now about how much I value Diane’s teaching and teaching skill, and I really am delighted that this decision provides a way for generations of Johnson State students to have access to her classroom teaching.”

A woman, Diane Huling-Reed, sitting at a piano and smiling at the camera.

Professor Diane Huling-Reed  (Photo courtesy of Eric Kirk)

 

 

PRT Committee member Jim Black declined to discuss specifics, noting,” Personnel issues are not a matter of public record.”

 

He did, however, elaborate on the tenure review process, noting that “the first step is for the Promotion Tenure and Review committee to review the faculty member’s personnel file. The union contract specifies three areas for the review, teaching effectiveness, scholarly and professional activity and service to the college and community. Based on the documents placed in the file, the PRT committee makes a recommendation to the academic dean.”

The review process, President Murphy notes, is collaborative but she is the ultimate arbiter. “We might be looking at them with different lenses or different points of view, or seeing different things in the candidate’s folder,” she said. “I tend to think the process adds up to a whole and I get to make the final call. I don’t think there is any of us along the way who act without an awareness of the other person’s role [in the review process] and I think that the faculty and the dean did really good work here as that committee always does, and as the dean always does in these cases. I don’t practically like to disagree… and I think when that happens everyone is respectful and people assume that the other party has just seen something different in the files, or put an emphasis on something different.”

Murphy echoed Regan’s endorsement of Huling-Reed as an effective and dedicated teacher noting universal acknowledgement of her value to both the music program and its students. “I think that all of us who reviewed this file are in agreement that Professor Huling is a very strong, excellent teacher and no one ever had questions about her professional abilities,” she said. “I think the fact that she will continue teaching and be a resource to music students and colleagues in the department with the whole performing arts facility is a good thing.”

On that point, Huling-Reed’s students certainly seem to agree.

“I think it was preposterous she wasn’t given it in the first place,” said Jacob Lane. “Now they don’t have to worry about an irreplaceable teacher leaving the school.”

Christopher Scott Currier Jr. felt that Huling-Reed’s departure would have been a serious blow to the quality of the music program at the college. “She deserves it. She’s an excellent teacher…I think if the school didn’t keep her, then we would have lost one of the greatest teachers, and the program would have gone downhill.”

For Kyle Reardon, Murphy’s reconsideration of Huling-Reed’s tenure status was welcome and appropriate. “I’m so psyched,” he said. “She’s like the heart and soul of the music program. Every student has to go through her class. There’s not a student here who doesn’t respect her.”